Advantages of distance jobs

Nowadays many people choose distance jobs. Due to the article "It's Unclearly Defined, but Telecommuting Is Fast on the Rise" (Tugend, 2014), we see that telecommuting is rising year by year. It estimates up to 79 percent from 2005 to 2012 and has 3.2 million workers, in the statistics issue from American Community Survey.

This type of job gives opportunity to work at home or in any other convenient place. It is useful not only for mothers with little children, but also for everyone. An average telecommute worker is 49 years old, a man or a woman. The number of companies, which are going to provide distance jobs, increases year by year.

Last winter showed us how telecommute helps to save government's money. According to the research of president of Global Workplace Analytics, Washington skimped up to $ 32 million. Moreover, as this movement grows, we see that telecommuting is important. This is the only way the company will know how to build jobs and project work practices and decide which technologies need to support.

Distance jobs are not limited. Everyone can do it: men, women, parents, families without children, young and old. You can be more productive when you work at home; moreover, it is possible to spend much time you need to do your job great. In addition, for some people it is ideal. Therefore, you may still work in the office, and take some job home. Kipp Jarecke says that it takes some time to get used to work at home. Furthermore, you miss communications with colleagues; you have to plan your day by yourself, etc. For some people the connections are virtual, but for others nothing takes place, which allows you to chat with fellow cubicle divider.

The first thing to decide, however, is a slippery word meaning a "telecommuter." The most complete definition is someone employed full-time in a private, non-profit or governmental organization that works at least half of the time at home. For example, many of the managers and professionals do distance work on weekends, after five days in the office. These people check email, return calls and write reports from home.

Professor of economics at Stanford University, Nicholas Bloom, together with China's largest travel agency was checking some ideas about telecommuting. During nine months, about 250 employees were taking part in this experiment. They were divided half to half, where one part was working at home, and one in the office. At the end of the experiment, employers have found that telecommute employees were working 13percent productively.

Nevertheless, at the end of the experiment, half of those who worked at home desired to return to the office. They said that they felt alone. It seems that most people would like to have some combination of home and office work.

In addition, there is a Flex Job service, which helps job seekers to find their dream work in freelancing or telecommuting. Of course, due to internet system we all have an opportunity to work from home. Once, there was even one position for a doctor, who was able to visit different places and perform brain surgery. Therefore, telecommuting is very popular among people who like freedom and self-control.

In addition, telecommuting is a money saving project. Last year, Telework Research Network Company saved about $ 96 million thanks to teleworkers. They did not pay for rent of the office, for electricity, IT, etc. Moreover, we should say that remote workers show better results comparing to office workers, they even seem to be happier. There are different jobs and different positions at remote work. Sometimes companies hire even managers, VPS and executive directors. In addition, you may find the position of virtual assistant or other vacations. It means that telecommute jobs are very famous now.

References

Sutton Fell, S. (2012, August 19). These telecommuting jobs will surprise you. Retrieved from Mashable: http://mashable.com

Tugend, A. (2014, March 7). It's unclearly defined, but telecommuting is fast on the rise. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com